Hiring an AI Employee here looks like hiring a person, because that is the only way the work stays reviewable.
Title, mission, responsibilities, the systems it touches and the channels it works on. Same information you would give a recruiter.
The analyzer scores the role against all 10 packaged Solutions and every employee you already hired. Green hires, amber needs edits, red is blocked.
What it may do alone, what needs your approval, what it may never do, and how much it may spend.
Handbooks, price sheets, policies, product docs. The employee cites these inside its own workspace.
A computer, a phone number and an email address are created and attached to the hire.
It joins conversations and meetings under floor control: no overlap, no dead air, a written recap every time.
Five dimensions, weighted. A high score means the role is close to something you can already buy.
| Dimension | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Mission | 35% | Does the core job statement restate a Solution's job |
| Output artifacts | 22% | Same deliverables leaving the building |
| Decision rights | 18% | Same authority to commit, spend, promise or ship |
| Channels | 15% | Same phone, email, chat or meeting surface |
| Tools | 10% | Same systems of record |
Additive role. You can hire it.
Real overlap. Narrow the scope, then re-check.
Redundant. Hire is blocked and we send you to the Solution.